I need support with this History question so I can learn better.do you think Sulla’s career benefited or damaged the democratic ideals of the Roman Republic’s system? Hindsight tells us that the republic did fail but not immediately. Some ideas to consider while answering the question:Was Sulla the “beginning of the end” for Rome, or had that process already started with people like the Gracchi Brothers and their battles with the Senate?In what ways and for how long did the republic continue to function (even if only nominally) after Sulla’s death?- Need to cite from the reading
Requirements: 3-4 pages double space